Gollel v. Gollel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gollel v. Gollel

72 A.D.3d 1644, 899 N.Y.S.2d 696

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2010

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.D.3d 1644 (Gollel v. Gollel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gollel v. Gollel, 72 A.D.3d 1644, 899 N.Y.S.2d 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Gail A. Donofrio, A.J.), entered October 9, 2009 in a divorce action. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon reargument adhered to the court’s prior decision denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Now, upon the stipulation discontinuing action signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 18, 2010 and filed in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office on February 24, 2010,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Gail A. Donofrio, A.J.), entered October 9, 2009 in a divorce action. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon reargument adhered to the court’s prior decision denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Now, upon the stipulation discontinuing action signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 18, 2010 and filed in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office on February 24, 2010,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.3d 1644, 899 N.Y.S.2d 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gollel-v-gollel-nyappdiv-2010.