Golinvauz v. Bill Bower Friendly Ford

303 So. 2d 406, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8316
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1974·No. No. 74-404·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals an order dismissing his complaint with prejudice. The order appealed sets forth the fact that the plaintiff, who was proceeding without an attorney, repeatedly failed to respond to regularly noticed hearings on the motions to [407]*407dismiss. Notices of hearing were sent to both of two noted addresses of the plaintiff. We hold that in the absence of an adequate excuse shown in this record for plaintiff’s delay of the trial court proceedings, that court properly dismissed the cause. See Warriner v. Ferraro, Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 723.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golinvauz v. Bill Bower Friendly Ford, 303 So. 2d 406, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8316 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

303 So. 2d 406 (Golinvauz v. Bill Bower Friendly Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warriner v. Ferraro
177 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)