Golinsky v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Golinsky v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

74 A.D.2d 895, 425 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 895 (Golinsky v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Golinsky v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, 74 A.D.2d 895, 425 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298. of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated October 1, 1979 which (1) vacated an order of the State Division of Human Rights dated July 17, 1979, which dismissed the complaint of Ethel Golinsky upon a finding of no probable cause and (2) dismissed the complaint on the ground it was not processed within the statutorily prescribed period. Petition granted to the extent that the order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the appeal board for a determination on the merits of the issues raised on petitioner’s appeal to it (see Matter of [896]*896Sarkisian Bros, v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816). Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298. of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated October 1, 1979 which (1) vacated an order of the State Division of Human Rights dated July 17, 1979, which dismissed the complaint of Ethel Golinsky upon a finding of no probable cause and (2) dismissed the complaint on the ground it was not processed within the statutorily prescribed period. Petition granted to the extent that the order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the appeal board for a determination on the merits of the issues raised on petitioner’s appeal to it (see Matter of [896]*896Sarkisian Bros, v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816). Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 895, 425 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golinsky-v-new-york-state-human-rights-appeal-board-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack