Golin v. Scophyl Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Golin v. Scophyl Realty Corp.

27 A.D.2d 921, 282 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4396

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 921 (Golin v. Scophyl Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Golin v. Scophyl Realty Corp., 27 A.D.2d 921, 282 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered June 21, 1966, denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law and summary judgment granted to appellant, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. The defenses raised by respondents are spurious. The steps pursued by appellant herein were all within the scope of the loan agreement. No legitimate challenge is raised either with respect to liability on the note or to computation of the balance due, which is readily ascertainable; thus, there is eliminated any need of an assessment. There being no factual issues, appellant is clearly entitled to the relief requested. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and McGivem, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered June 21, 1966, denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law and summary judgment granted to appellant, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. The defenses raised by respondents are spurious. The steps pursued by appellant herein were all within the scope of the loan agreement. No legitimate challenge is raised either with respect to liability on the note or to computation of the balance due, which is readily ascertainable; thus, there is eliminated any need of an assessment. There being no factual issues, appellant is clearly entitled to the relief requested. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and McGivem, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 921, 282 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golin-v-scophyl-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1967.