Golightly v. Tatum
118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 594, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 541
This text of 118 S.E. 501 (Golightly v. Tatum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Golightly v. Tatum, 118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 594, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 541 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinion
This ease is here upon the sole assignment of .error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. There was evidence to authorize the verdict in favor of the defendant, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. It was therefore not error to overrule the motion for a new tiral.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 594, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golightly-v-tatum-gactapp-1923.