Golightly v. Reeves
Opinion
The motion for a new trial in this case contains no special grounds. “ Under the facts as disclosed by the record, this court cannot say that the verdict of the jury is without support from the testimony or so far contrary to it as to authorize this court to determine that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial. The law allows him to refuse or grant new trials in the exercise of a legal discretion, but [786] it does not give this court any discretion in the matter. It can only grant new trials when errors of law have been committed, or when the trial judge has abused his discretion in refusing a new trial.” Smith v. State, 91 Ga. 188 (17 S. E. 68).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
119 S.E. 432 (Golightly v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.