Golightly v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Golightly v. Anderson

823 S.W.2d 4, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1170, 1991 WL 142328

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 1991·No. No. 59069·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this modification of a decree of dissolution case, mother appeals the trial court’s denial of both her request for attorney’s fees and her request to make the increased child support award retroactive to the date of the filing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this modification of a decree of dissolution case, mother appeals the trial court’s denial of both her request for attorney’s fees and her request to make the increased child support award retroactive to the date of the filing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Golightly v. Anderson, 823 S.W.2d 4, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1170, 1991 WL 142328 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 4 (Golightly v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.