Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Golia v. Velez

Golia v. Velez

97 A.D.3d 416, 948 N.Y.2d 63
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.3d 416 (Golia v. Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golia v. Velez, 97 A.D.3d 416, 948 N.Y.2d 63 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Respondent’s determination was supported by substantial evidence (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181 [1978]), including the inspector’s testimony that the residence’s garage space had been converted into a separate dwelling unit, which was not permitted by the certificate of occupancy. Petitioner was provided with sufficient notice of the violation (see Matter of McDonald v Fischer, 93 AD3d 969, 969 [2012]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
McDonald v. Fischer
93 A.D.3d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.D.3d 416, 948 N.Y.2d 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golia-v-velez-nyappdiv-2012.