Golembe v. Blumberg

262 A.D. 759, 27 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5776
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 19, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 759 (Golembe v. Blumberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golembe v. Blumberg, 262 A.D. 759, 27 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Liability is sought to be cast upon the respondent herein in three of the causes of action for having bought for his epileptic son, an adult, who was known by respondent to be an epileptic, an automobile, in the use of which, the son, at a time when he had an epileptic fit, ran into a pole and a tree, as a result of which plaintiffs, who were passengers in the ear, were injured. No question is raised as to the knowledge by plaintiffs of the son’s physical incapacity. The complaint states a cause of action (Restatement, Torts, § 390) and it was error to have dismissed the three causes of action. An automobile in and of itself is not a dangerous instrument, but may become such in the hands of a person physically incompetent to handle it. (Gillner v. Wallace, 240 App. Div. 1003.) Order dismissing the first, fourth and seventh causes of action against defendant Harry Blumberg, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and time to answer extended until ten days after the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GRAHAM, RAEQUEL L. v. JONES, CHARLESETA
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Graham v. Jones
147 A.D.3d 1369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Lott v. Strang
727 N.E.2d 407 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2000)
Broadwater v. Dorsey
688 A.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1997)
Broadwater v. Dorsey
666 A.2d 1282 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1995)
Zedella v. Gibson
650 N.E.2d 1000 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1995)
Salinas v. General Motors Corp.
857 S.W.2d 944 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Zara v. Perzan
185 A.D.2d 236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Peterson v. Halsted
829 P.2d 373 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1992)
Guay v. Winner
154 Misc. 2d 71 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
Good v. MacDonell
149 Misc. 2d 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
Vince v. Wilson
561 A.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1989)
Talbott v. Csakany
199 Cal. App. 3d 700 (California Court of Appeal, 1988)
Larsen v. Heitmann
133 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Kahlenberg v. Goldstein
431 A.2d 76 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1981)
Albert v. Guerrero
103 Misc. 2d 530 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Allstate Insurance v. Reliance Insurance
85 Misc. 2d 734 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Sikora v. Wade
342 A.2d 580 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Edwards v. Pickens
66 Misc. 2d 352 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 759, 27 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golembe-v-blumberg-nyappdiv-1941.