Goldy v. Samson

2018 NY Slip Op 7060
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 2018
Docket7427N 312210/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 7060 (Goldy v. Samson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldy v. Samson, 2018 NY Slip Op 7060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Goldy v Samson (2018 NY Slip Op 07060)
Goldy v Samson
2018 NY Slip Op 07060
Decided on October 23, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 23, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Kahn, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

7427N 312210/16

[*1] Jason R. Goldy, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Simona Samson, Defendant-Respondent.


Law Offices of Howard B. Felcher, PLLC, New York (Howard B. Felcher of counsel), for appellant.

Jan Levien, P.C., New York (Jan Levien of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael L. Katz, J.), entered on or about January 22, 2018, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff father's motion to find defendant mother in contempt, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record shows that although the mother improperly suspended the father's visitation after the child sustained an injury while in his care, she immediately resumed visitation upon direction from the court, and the father had already made up the missed visits by the time the court heard oral arguments on the issue. Under such circumstances, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the court to decline to hold the mother in contempt (see Kulhan v Courniotes, 209 AD2d 383 [2d

Dept 1994]; see also Rodman v Friedman, 33 AD3d 400 [1st Dept 2006], lv dismissed 8 NY3d 895 [2007]; Judiciary Law §§ 750, 753).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 23, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodman v. Friedman
33 A.D.3d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Kulhan v. Courniotes
209 A.D.2d 383 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 7060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldy-v-samson-nyappdiv-2018.