Goldwasser v. Morton & Co.

127 N.Y.S. 1122
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 127 N.Y.S. 1122 (Goldwasser v. Morton & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldwasser v. Morton & Co., 127 N.Y.S. 1122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sold certain goods to the defendant through a salesman named Samuel. Samuel apparently was authorized to collect payment. Both Samuel and the defendant’s manager testify that all the goods were paid for. No direct contradiction of their testimony was given. The record of the plaintiff’s testimony is quite unintelligible, and in its present state fails to disclose any reasonable ground for the complete disregard for the testimony produced by_ the defendant. Under these circumstances it seems to us that judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 N.Y.S. 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldwasser-v-morton-co-nyappterm-1911.