Goldtooth v. The Western Sugar Cooperative

District Court, D. Nebraska·Decided August 31, 2020·No. 8:20-cv-00113·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

CODY GOLDTOOTH,

Plaintiff, 8:20CV113

vs. ORDER THE WESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE,

Defendant and Third- Party Plaintiff,

vs.

DSI MECHANICAL, LLC and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Third-Party Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 37, filed by Third-Party Defendant DSI Mechanical, LLC (DSI). On August 11, 2020, the Court ordered DSI to show cause as to why its motion should not be denied as moot. ECF No. 44. On August 20, 2020, DSI indicated that its motion may be denied as moot as to Western’s contractual indemnity claim.1 ECF No. 45. Therefore, DSI’s motion will be denied as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1 Western brings three claims in its Second Amended Third-Party Complaint: 1) contractual indemnification, 2) contractual claim for attorneys’ fees and costs, and 3) waiver of subrogation interest. ECF No. 32 at Page ID 161–63. In its briefing, DSI does not address Western’s claim for attorneys’ fees and addresses Western’s claim regarding waiver of subrogation for the first time in its reply brief. The Court will not address these arguments as they have not been fully briefed. See Cont’l Indem. Co v. IPFS of N.Y., LLC, No. 8:19CV485, 2020 WL 1248577, at *3 (D. Neb. Mar. 16, 2020). DSI’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 37, is denied as moot. Dated this 31st day of August 2020. BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp Senior United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldtooth v. The Western Sugar Cooperative, (D. Neb. 2020).

Goldtooth v. The Western Sugar Cooperative (Goldtooth v. The Western Sugar Cooperative) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.