Goldstone v. Yellow Taxi Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstone v. Yellow Taxi Corp.

229 A.D. 742

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 742 (Goldstone v. Yellow Taxi Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstone v. Yellow Taxi Corp., 229 A.D. 742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial of the issues raised by the defendant’s first separate complete and affirmative defense granted. Under the circumstances there should be no costs of this appeal. The evidence on the question as to whether or not plaintiff was an employee of the defendant at the time of the accident presented a question of fact for the jury and the trial court erred in directing a verdict. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial of the issues raised by the defendant’s first separate complete and affirmative defense granted. Under the circumstances there should be no costs of this appeal. The evidence on the question as to whether or not plaintiff was an employee of the defendant at the time of the accident presented a question of fact for the jury and the trial court erred in directing a verdict. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstone-v-yellow-taxi-corp-nyappdiv-1930.