Goldstone v. BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY
This text of 711 N.W.2d 742 (Goldstone v. BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
George H. GOLDSTONE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order limited to the issue whether defendant's challenged library policy is a violation of Const. 1963, art. 8, § 9.
The Michigan Municipal League and the Michigan Library Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae on the issue identified above. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of that issue may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
711 N.W.2d 742, 474 Mich. 1103, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstone-v-bloomfield-township-public-library-mich-2006.