Goldstein v. Zoning Commission
253 A.2d 37, 157 Conn. 595
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed on the authority of I. R. Stich Associates, Inc. v. Town Council, 155 Conn. 1, 3, 229 A.2d 545, Kyser v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 236, 241, 230 A.2d 595, and Hughes v. Town Planning & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 505, 507, 242 A.2d 705.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. Zoning Commission, 253 A.2d 37, 157 Conn. 595 (Colo. 1968).
253 A.2d 37 (Goldstein v. Zoning Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith-Walleck v. Woodbury Planning Comm., No. Cv99-0155988-S (Apr. 14, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3914 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Van Eck v. Town of East Haven Zoning, No. Cv97 0400937 (Mar. 11, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 2445 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Park City Realty v. Zoning Comm'n, No. Cv93 30 76 25 S (Mar. 25, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 3160 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Hartford Distributors, Inc. v. Liquor Control Commission
419 A.2d 346 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1979)