Goldstein v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Wright

264 A.D. 836, 35 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4933

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 1942·Published

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, without costs, and items 2 and 3 of the demand for a biE of particulars aEowed as modified herein: 2. An itemized statement of the services rendered by plaintiff to the copartnership of Wright & Sexton as aEeged in paragraph “ seventh ” of the complaint. 3. An itemized statement of services rendered by plaintiff to said George S. Simpson individually^ in contradistinction [837]*837to services rendered to the copartnership. Verified bill of particulars to be served within fifteen days after service of order. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, without costs, and items 2 and 3 of the demand for a biE of particulars aEowed as modified herein: 2. An itemized statement of the services rendered by plaintiff to the copartnership of Wright & Sexton as aEeged in paragraph “ seventh ” of the complaint. 3. An itemized statement of services rendered by plaintiff to said George S. Simpson individually^ in contradistinction [837]*837to services rendered to the copartnership. Verified bill of particulars to be served within fifteen days after service of order. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Goldstein v. Wright, 264 A.D. 836, 35 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 836 (Goldstein v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.