Goldstein v. Wortmann

712 So. 2d 397, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2285, 1998 WL 113565
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1998
DocketNo. 97-1418
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 712 So. 2d 397 (Goldstein v. Wortmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldstein v. Wortmann, 712 So. 2d 397, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2285, 1998 WL 113565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

KLEIN, Judge.

Appellant was a defendant in this mortgage foreclosure and responded to a summary judgment hearing set for March 20, 1997, by delivering an affidavit to opposing counsel at 4:00 p.m. on March 18,1997. The trial court struck appellant’s affidavit as not being timely filed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c), which provides:

The adverse party may serve opposing affidavits by mailing the affidavits at least 5 days prior to the day of the hearing, or by delivering the affidavits to the movant’s attorney no later than 5:00 p.m. two business days prior to the day of hearing.

The parties have both resorted to rule 1.090(a), which governs the computation of time; however, they cannot agree on how to read rule 1.090(a) in conjunction with rule 1.510(c). We conclude that it is unnecessary to consult rule 1.090(a), because of the clarity of rule 1.510(c). If the day of the hearing was March 20, one day prior to the hearing was March 19, and two days prior to the hearing was March 18. Accordingly, appellant had until 5:00 p.m. on March 18 to deliver the affidavit.

We therefore conclude that the trial court erred in striking the affidavit. Appellee does not argue that the trial court’s failure to consider the affidavit was harmless error, [398]*398and we agree with the appellant that his affidavit does raise material issues of fact.

Reversed.

■ FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.T.G. Furniture Corp. v. Coates
93 So. 3d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Mayzell v. Quarles & Brady
744 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 So. 2d 397, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2285, 1998 WL 113565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-wortmann-fladistctapp-1998.