Goldstein v. Valentine

246 A.D. 610
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Action for damages by reason of an alleged conspiracy to render valueless a mortgage held by plaintiff on a lease of real estate made by defendants Valentine to 225 West Thirty-fourth Street, Inc., and by it assigned to defendant Brand and by him assigned to the H. Russell Brand Realty Co., Inc. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for the examination of the appellants before trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and, therefore, an examination of the defendants-appellants should not be granted. Hagarty, Scudder, TompMns, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldstein v. Valentine, 246 A.D. 610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 610 (Goldstein v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.
19 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Ingber v. Weinbrot
198 Misc. 824 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1950)
Shea v. Shea
270 A.D. 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Bienenfeld v. Mortgage Commission
161 Misc. 311 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1936)