Goldstein v. . Union Railway Company of New York City
130 N.E. 897, 230 N.Y. 570, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 625
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. . Union Railway Company of New York City, 130 N.E. 897, 230 N.Y. 570, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 625 (N.Y. 1920).
130 N.E. 897 (Goldstein v. . Union Railway Company of New York City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Porter v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.
235 A.D. 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Quinn v. Union Railway Co.
134 Misc. 188 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1929)
Unger v. Belt Line Railway Corp.
136 N.E. 303 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)