Goldstein v. Stone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goldstein v. Stone

96 So. 2d 227, 1957 Fla. App. LEXIS 650

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 1957

DocketNo. 57-5

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 96 So. 2d 227 (Goldstein v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Stone, 96 So. 2d 227, 1957 Fla. App. LEXIS 650 (Fla. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this Court. It is apparent to the Court upon perusal of the record that the Chancellor below based his findings upon conflicting evidence. We follow the rule so often enunciated by the Supreme Court of this State that the findings of a Chancellor based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous. Cobb v. Cobb, 82 Fla. 287, 89 So. 869; Grantham v. Grantham, 140 Fla. 120, 191 So. 197; Peterson v. Plancock, 146 Fla. 410, 1 So.2d 255; Monyak v. Monyak, Fla., 43 So.2d 903; Town of Howey in the Hills v. Graessle, Fla., 57 So.2d 422, and Loew v. Friedman, Fla., 80 So.2d 672. We find no reversible error in the record and therefore conclude that the cause should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this Court. It is apparent to the Court upon perusal of the record that the Chancellor below based his findings upon conflicting evidence. We follow the rule so often enunciated by the Supreme Court of this State that the findings of a Chancellor based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous. Cobb v. Cobb, 82 Fla. 287, 89 So. 869; Grantham v. Grantham, 140 Fla. 120, 191 So. 197; Peterson v. Plancock, 146 Fla. 410, 1 So.2d 255; Monyak v. Monyak, Fla., 43 So.2d 903; Town of Howey in the Hills v. Graessle, Fla., 57 So.2d 422, and Loew v. Friedman, Fla., 80 So.2d 672. We find no reversible error in the record and therefore conclude that the cause should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 So. 2d 227, 1957 Fla. App. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-stone-fladistctapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack