Goldstein v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Stern

18 A.D.2d 672, 235 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6481

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 672 (Goldstein v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Stern, 18 A.D.2d 672, 235 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover the down payment and the title examination expense on a contract for the sale to plaintiff of defendants’ real property, and to impress a lien upon the property for the amount of such payment and expense, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 7, 1962, which denied his motion for summary judgment; and the defendants cross appeal from said order insofar as it fails to grant them summary judgment against the plaintiff (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113, subds. 1, 2). On plaintiff’s appeal: Order affirmed, without costs. On defendants’ cross appeal: Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The record presents triable issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment in favor of either the plaintiff or the defendants. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [32 Mise 2d 779.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover the down payment and the title examination expense on a contract for the sale to plaintiff of defendants’ real property, and to impress a lien upon the property for the amount of such payment and expense, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 7, 1962, which denied his motion for summary judgment; and the defendants cross appeal from said order insofar as it fails to grant them summary judgment against the plaintiff (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113, subds. 1, 2). On plaintiff’s appeal: Order affirmed, without costs. On defendants’ cross appeal: Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The record presents triable issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment in favor of either the plaintiff or the defendants. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [32 Mise 2d 779.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 672, 235 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-stern-nyappdiv-1962.