Goldstein v. State

469 So. 2d 124, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 276, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3326
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 9, 1985·No. No. 64168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction for conflict with State v. Casper, 417 So.2d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), review denied, 418 So.2d 1280 [125] (Fla.1982). The facts in this case are legally indistinguishable from those in Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985).

Accordingly, we quash the decision of the district court, 435 So.2d 352, and remand for further action consistent with Cruz.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ALDERMAN, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldstein v. State, 469 So. 2d 124, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 276, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3326 (Fla. 1985).

469 So. 2d 124 (Goldstein v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruz v. State
465 So. 2d 516 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
State v. Casper
417 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Goldstein v. State
435 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)