Goldstein v. Stadler's Shoes, Inc.
This text of 159 Misc. 804 (Goldstein v. Stadler's Shoes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rent for the quarter commencing June 1, 1929, became due in advance on that date. There being no evidence that defendant surrendered possession, or was evicted or otherwise damaged, during the quarter, the fact that title to the premises vested by condemnation in the city of New York August ninth following did not entitle defendant to recover on its counterclaim on the theory of apportionment for the period from that date to the end of the quarter. (Giles v. Comstock, 4 N. Y. 270; Gugel v. Isaacs, 21 App. Div. 503; affd. on opinion below, 162 N. Y. 636.)
Judgment modified by increasing plaintiff’s recovery to the sum of $906.75, with costs, and as modified affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.
All concur. Present — Levy, Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 Misc. 804, 288 N.Y.S. 793, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-stadlers-shoes-inc-nyappterm-1936.