Goldstein v. Southgate Owners Corp.

2024 NY Slip Op 30498(U)

• Court: New York Supreme Court, New York County
• Decided: February 15, 2024
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Goldstein v Southgate Owners Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 30498(U) February 15, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 131344/2022 Judge: Paul A. Goetz Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/2024 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 131344/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 153 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. PAUL A. GOETZ PART ·. 47 Justice X INDEX NO. 131344/2022 LINDA GOLDSTEIN, . 12/18/2023, Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 12/18/2023

-v- MOTION SEQ. NO. · 002 003

SOUTHGATE OWNERS CORP., TOMMY TUNE, TOMMY TUNE, INC.,JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, XYS CORP DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendant. -------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70,71, 72,73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79,80,81, 109,111,112,114,115,118,119,120,121,122,123, 124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,146,147 were read on this motion to/for DISCOVERY

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99, 100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,110,113, 116,117,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,145,148 were read on this motion to/for DISCOVERY

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

In Motion Sequence 002, defendant, Southgate Owners Corp. ("Southgate") moves for a

protective order to strike plaintiff's discovery demands dated January 3rd, 2023. Southgate also

seeks to compel plaintiff and co-defendant Tommy Tune, Inc. ("Tune") to provide responses to

outstanding discovery. Southgate also seeks attorney's fees and costs incurred in bringing this

motion. In Motion Sequence 003, plaintiff moves to· strike the defendants answers or in the

alternative to compel Southgate and Tune to provide outstanding discovery in January 3rd, 2023

demands served on each party. Plaintiff also moves to compel both defendants to supply a

Verified Bill of Particulars. Finally, plaintiff also seeks attorney's fees and costs incurred in

bringing this motion.

. 131344/2022 GOLDSTEIN, LINDA vs. SOUTHGATE OWNERS CORP. ET AL Page 1 of4 Motion No. 002 003

[* 1] 1 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/2024 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 131344/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 153 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2024

Turning to the January 3rd, 2023 demands (NYSCEF Doc No 96) and Southgate's

response (NYSCEF Doc No 97) the documents sought are material and necessary to the case and

are not overly broad. With respect to Demand:

(1) Southgate will produce any such documents in their possession;

(3) - (16); (19) - (22) Southgate will produce any such documents in its possession as

documents relating to the Booster Pump and the Mechanical Room are material and

necessary to the case. If Southgate is not in possession of these records, it shall provide a

. Jackson affidavit stating so;

(23) Southgate's response is sufficient

(24) Southgate will produce any such documents in their possession or if Southgate is not

in possession of these records, it shall provide a Jackson affidavit stating so;

(25)-(27) Southgate will produce any such documents in its possession of the Minutes of

the Board Meetings to the extent that they relate to the Booster Pump, the water leak, the

alteration agreement, and references to the plaintiff and her apartment that are relevant to

the current case. If Southgate is asserting that these documents are privileged they shall

provide a privilege log stating the privilege they are asserting.

(28) Southgate will produce any such documents in their possession;

(29) Southgate will produce any such documents in their possession. If Southgate is

asserting that these documents are privileged they shall provide a privilege log stating the

privilege they are asserting;

(30) - (33) Southgate will produce any such documents in their possession or if Southgate

is not in possession of these records, it shall provide a Jackson affidavit stating so;

(34) Southgate's response is sufficient;

131344/2022 GOLDSTEIN, LINDA vs. SOUTHGATE OWNERS CORP. ET AL Page 2 of4 Motion No. 002 003

[* 2] 2 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/2024 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 131344/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 153 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2024

(35) - (36) Southgate will produce any such documents in their possession. If Southgate is

asserting that these documents are privileged they shall provide a privilege log stating the

(3 7) - (46) Southgate' s response is sufficient.

Turning to plaintiff's January 3, 2023 demands towards Tune (NYSCEF Doc No 99) and

Tune's Response (NYSCEF Doc ·101), tune shall provide an affidavit stating that the documents

it claims are not in it's possession are also not in its "possession, custody or control" as required

by CPLR § 3120.

Turning to Southgate' s outstanding demands, plaintiff shall provide the authorizations and

documentation to the extent they have not already been provided in the email dated October 27,

· 2023 (NYSCEF Doc No 126). If the link that plaintiff provided has expired as Southgate alleges,

plaintiff shall provide a working link.

Defendant Tune shall provide .responses to Southgate' s outstanding discovery demands ., - dated September 14, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc No 76).

Accordingly it is,

ORDERED that plaintiff' motion to compel (Motion Sequence 003) is granted to the extent

indicated; and it is further

ORDERED that defendants shall provide Verified Bills of Particulars to plaintiff in the

demands dated September 1, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc Nos 102 & 104); and it is further

ORDERED that defendants shall produce to plaintiff on or before March 14, 2024 the

documents listed above; and it is further

131344/2022 GOLDSTEIN, LINDA vs. SOUTHGATE OWNERS CORP. ET AL Page 3 of4 Motion No. 002 003

[* 3] 3 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/2024 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 131344/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 153 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2024

ORDERED that the portion of Southgate's motion (Motion Sequence 002) that seeks to

compel outstanding discovery is granted to the extent indicated; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff and Tune shall produce to Southgate on or before March 14, 2024

the documents listed above; and it is further

ORDERED that the portions of both motions which seek to strike the parties answers, and

preclude the opposing J)arties from presenting evidence is denied "in furtherance of the policy

favoring resolution of actions on the merits" (Cigna Prop. and Cas. Co. v Decoration and Design

Bldg. Partnership, 268 AD2d 223 [1st Dept 2000]); and it is further

ORDERED that the parties' application for sanctions and attorneys' fees is denied; and it

is further

ORDERED that the discovery conference scheduled for February 22, 2024 is adjourned

until March 21, 2024 to allow for compliance with this order.

¾ -~-,:- -' ~'"'."-~"'" -"' 2/15/2024 DATE - - • PAUL ~S'.is' =

~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE

131344/2022 GOLDSTEIN, LINDA vs. SOUTHGATE OWNERS CORP. ET AL Page4of4 Motion No. 002 003

[* 4] 4 of 4