Goldstein v. Shapiro

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Goldstein v. Shapiro

114 A. 926, 120 Me. 553, 1921 Me. LEXIS 109

DecidedJuly 16, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A. 926 (Goldstein v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Shapiro, 114 A. 926, 120 Me. 553, 1921 Me. LEXIS 109 (Me. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Action of assumpsit to recover commissions in the sale of real estate. The defendant filed a general motion to set aside a verdict rendered for the plaintiff. Held:

That the points in controversy were purely issues of fact and their decision depended largely upon the credibility of the witnesses. The verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence of the plaintiff if believed. This court cannot say that the jury manifestly erred in believing it. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action of assumpsit to recover commissions in the sale of real estate. The defendant filed a general motion to set aside a verdict rendered for the plaintiff. Held:

That the points in controversy were purely issues of fact and their decision depended largely upon the credibility of the witnesses. The verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence of the plaintiff if believed. This court cannot say that the jury manifestly erred in believing it. Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A. 926, 120 Me. 553, 1921 Me. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-shapiro-me-1921.