Goldstein v. Schick
237 A.D. 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order denying motion to amend final judgment by eliminating the direction that defendants pay a certain amount of money into court reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The amendment sought by defendants related to an error of form and not to a matter of substance. It was, therefore, proper to amend and not to appeal from the judgment. (Simmons v. Craig, 137 N. Y. 550.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. Schick, 237 A.D. 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
237 A.D. 905 (Goldstein v. Schick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lexington & Fortieth Corp. v. Callaghan
24 N.E.2d 316 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n
153 Misc. 880 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)