Goldstein v. Schick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Schick

237 A.D. 905

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 A.D. 905 (Goldstein v. Schick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Schick, 237 A.D. 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to amend final judgment by eliminating the direction that defendants pay a certain amount of money into court reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The amendment sought by defendants related to an error of form and not to a matter of substance. It was, therefore, proper to amend and not to appeal from the judgment. (Simmons v. Craig, 137 N. Y. 550.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to amend final judgment by eliminating the direction that defendants pay a certain amount of money into court reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The amendment sought by defendants related to an error of form and not to a matter of substance. It was, therefore, proper to amend and not to appeal from the judgment. (Simmons v. Craig, 137 N. Y. 550.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-schick-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack