Goldstein v. Philadelphia School District

198 A. 863, 329 Pa. 71, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 474
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 12, 1938·No. Appeals, 63 and 64·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The minor plaintiff, 12 years of age, was injured while playing on the fire escape of one of the schools maintained by appellee. It appears the child tripped over a pile of books placed on the steps by other pupils during recess. Appellants contended that permitting the chil *72 dren to place books on tbe fire escape as a daily babit and to use it for play, constituted a nuisance which tbe school district negligently permitted to exist.

Tbe court below properly concluded that tbe condition described by appellants’ witnesses did not constitute a nuisance. At most, tbe agents and servants of tbe school district were negligent in permitting tbe pupils to do tbe things related, and it is well settled that a school district is not liable for tbe ordinary negligence of its employees: Carlo v. Scranton School District, 319 Pa. 417.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldstein v. Philadelphia School District, 198 A. 863, 329 Pa. 71, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 474 (Pa. 1938).

198 A. 863 (Goldstein v. Philadelphia School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moss v. School District of Norristown
250 F. Supp. 917 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1966)
Rupe v. State Public School Building Authority
245 F. Supp. 726 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
Supler v. North Franklin Township School District
182 A.2d 535 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Carter v. United Novelty & Premium Co.
132 A.2d 202 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Hartness v. Allegheny County
37 A.2d 18 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Kesman v. Fallowfield Township School District
29 A.2d 17 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Devlin v. Philadelphia School District
10 A.2d 408 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)