Goldstein v. Olympus Optical Co.
473 N.E.2d 764, 63 N.Y.2d 1006, 484 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4758
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 991).
[1009]*1009Concur: Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Chief Judge Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. Olympus Optical Co., 473 N.E.2d 764, 63 N.Y.2d 1006, 484 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4758 (N.Y. 1984).
473 N.E.2d 764 (Goldstein v. Olympus Optical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lansing Research Corp. v. Sybron Corp.
142 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)