Goldstein v. . New York State Railways
113 N.E. 1058, 218 N.Y. 744, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1266
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cdddebaok, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. . New York State Railways, 113 N.E. 1058, 218 N.Y. 744, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1266 (N.Y. 1916).
113 N.E. 1058 (Goldstein v. . New York State Railways) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.