Goldstein v. Muller
173 Ill. App. 664, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 473
Opinion
June 24, 1912, we reserved until the hearing a motion made by the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error in this cause because sued out more than thirty days after the judgment. We have now taken the cause into consideration and determined that we must grant the motion, for the reasons set forth in the opinion in Novelty Tufting Machinery Company v. The Peters & Roberts Furniture Company, 170 Ill. App. 134. The writ of error is therefore dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. Muller, 173 Ill. App. 664, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 473 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).
173 Ill. App. 664 (Goldstein v. Muller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grey v. Cohen
182 Ill. App. 313 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)