Goldstein v. McNamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. McNamara

279 A.D. 742, 109 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1951

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D. 742 (Goldstein v. McNamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. McNamara, 279 A.D. 742, 109 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion. Present — Glen-non, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Callahan and Shientag, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum: We dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the application. The proposed lists from which appointments are to be made involve positions with duties and examination requirements markedly and manifestly dissimilar to those of the instant position. We think that the use of such lists would result in a failure to follow the constitutional, requirement for appointment according to merit and fitness to be ascertained by competitive examination (N. Y. Const., art. V, § 6). [201 Misc. 253.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Present — Glen-non, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Callahan and Shientag, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum: We dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the application. The proposed lists from which appointments are to be made involve positions with duties and examination requirements markedly and manifestly dissimilar to those of the instant position. We think that the use of such lists would result in a failure to follow the constitutional, requirement for appointment according to merit and fitness to be ascertained by competitive examination (N. Y. Const., art. V, § 6). [201 Misc. 253.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D. 742, 109 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-mcnamara-nyappdiv-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack