Goldstein v. Mason Seamon Transportation Co.

137 N.Y.S. 961
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 8, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 137 N.Y.S. 961 (Goldstein v. Mason Seamon Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldstein v. Mason Seamon Transportation Co., 137 N.Y.S. 961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After issue was joined in this action, and several adjournments were had, the attorneys for the respective parties entered into a written stipulation adjourning the case from March 20 until April 3, 1912. This stipulation was made on March 18th, two days before the day set for trial. On March 20th, neither [962]*962side appearing in court to answer the call of the calendar, the case was dismissed. The plaintiff thereafter moved upon notice to open his default and vacate the judgment of dismissal, which motion was denied.

The court below did not lose jurisdiction of the case by reason of the dismissal. Johnson v. Monahan, 47 Misc. Rep. 689, 94 N. Y. Supp. 351. No good reason was shown, in the affidavits opposing the motion to open the default, why the same should not have been granted, and the order must be reversed.

Order reversed, and cause restored to the calendar, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Equitable Trust Co. v. Wehrenberg
143 N.Y.S. 1014 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 N.Y.S. 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-mason-seamon-transportation-co-nyappterm-1912.