Goldstein v. Liebowitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Goldstein v. Liebowitz

189 A. 503, 124 Pa. Super. 542, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 13, 1936·No. Appeal, 391·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

No issues were raised on the trial of this case but questions of fact, which were for the decision of the trial judge sitting without a jury. His findings in favor of the plaintiff are supported by testimony not inherently improbable and have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. They were sustained by the court in banc, which refused a new trial.

No sufficient reason has been given us for reversing this action of the court below.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

No issues were raised on the trial of this case but questions of fact, which were for the decision of the trial judge sitting without a jury. His findings in favor of the plaintiff are supported by testimony not inherently improbable and have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. They were sustained by the court in banc, which refused a new trial.

No sufficient reason has been given us for reversing this action of the court below.

Judgment affirmed,

Goldstein v. Liebowitz, 189 A. 503, 124 Pa. Super. 542, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277 (Pa. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

189 A. 503 (Goldstein v. Liebowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.