Goldstein v. Liebowitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Goldstein v. Liebowitz

189 A. 503, 124 Pa. Super. 542, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 13, 1936

DocketAppeal, 391

StatusPublished

This text of 189 A. 503 (Goldstein v. Liebowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Liebowitz, 189 A. 503, 124 Pa. Super. 542, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277 (Pa. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

No issues were raised on the trial of this case but questions of fact, which were for the decision of the trial judge sitting without a jury. His findings in favor of the plaintiff are supported by testimony not inherently improbable and have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. They were sustained by the court in banc, which refused a new trial.

No sufficient reason has been given us for reversing this action of the court below.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

No issues were raised on the trial of this case but questions of fact, which were for the decision of the trial judge sitting without a jury. His findings in favor of the plaintiff are supported by testimony not inherently improbable and have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. They were sustained by the court in banc, which refused a new trial.

No sufficient reason has been given us for reversing this action of the court below.

Judgment affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A. 503, 124 Pa. Super. 542, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-liebowitz-pasuperct-1936.