Goldstein v. Kaminsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Kaminsky

126 N.Y.S. 1130

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 126 N.Y.S. 1130 (Goldstein v. Kaminsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Kaminsky, 126 N.Y.S. 1130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

BRADX, J.

This action was brought fori conversion of a trunk and personal wearing apj' parel, etc, belonging to plaintiff. On close of. plaintiff’s evidence the complaint was dismissed. The testimony offered by plaintiff was sufficient to prove a prima facie case, and the complaint should not have been dismissed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRADX, J.

This action was brought fori conversion of a trunk and personal wearing apj' parel, etc, belonging to plaintiff. On close of. plaintiff’s evidence the complaint was dismissed. The testimony offered by plaintiff was sufficient to prove a prima facie case, and the complaint should not have been dismissed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 N.Y.S. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-kaminsky-nyappdiv-1911.