Goldstein v. Hershkowitz

139 N.Y.S. 3
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 9, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, an infant, was injured by slipping upon and falling over a rug laid in the front hall of a tenement house in which plaintiff’s parents were tenants. We do not think that any actionable negligence can be predicated upon the mere failure to nail a rug to the floor.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldstein v. Hershkowitz, 139 N.Y.S. 3 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

139 N.Y.S. 3 (Goldstein v. Hershkowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Felshin v. Sir
5 So. 2d 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)