Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Goldstein v. Hershkowitz

Goldstein v. Hershkowitz

139 N.Y.S. 3
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 9, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 N.Y.S. 3 (Goldstein v. Hershkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldstein v. Hershkowitz, 139 N.Y.S. 3 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, an infant, was injured by slipping upon and falling over a rug laid in the front hall of a tenement house in which plaintiff’s parents were tenants. We do not think that any actionable negligence can be predicated upon the mere failure to nail a rug to the floor.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Felshin v. Sir
5 So. 2d 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 N.Y.S. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-hershkowitz-nyappterm-1913.