Goldstein v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Goldstein v. Harris

130 So. 315, 221 Ala. 612, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 405

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedOctober 16, 1930

Docket6 Div. 669.

StatusPublished

This text of 130 So. 315 (Goldstein v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Harris, 130 So. 315, 221 Ala. 612, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 405 (Ala. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

Petition of Henry Goldstein, doing business as Hudson Bay Pur Company, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Goldstein v. Harris, 130 So. 313.

We concur in the result announced on the principle stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, that the specific moneys were obtained from the insurance company, and ex aequo et bono belonged to plaintiff; hence the right of recovery.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI