Goldstein v. Harris
130 So. 315, 221 Ala. 612, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 405
Opinion
Petition of Henry Goldstein, doing business as Hudson Bay Pur Company, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Goldstein v. Harris, 130 So. 313.
We concur in the result announced on the principle stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, that the specific moneys were obtained from the insurance company, and ex aequo et bono belonged to plaintiff; hence the right of recovery.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. Harris, 130 So. 315, 221 Ala. 612, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 405 (Ala. 1930).
130 So. 315 (Goldstein v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldstein v. Harris
130 So. 313 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)