Goldstein v. Harjes
222 A.D. 802
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goldstein v. Harjes. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D. 275 →
Opinion
Order modified by granting the motion to strike out the sixth counterclaim set up in the answer to the amended complaint, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present ■ — ■ Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. Harjes, 222 A.D. 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
222 A.D. 802 (Goldstein v. Harjes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.