Goldstein v. Greenberg

18 Misc. 61, 41 N.Y.S. 21, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 474
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedSeptember 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 18 Misc. 61 (Goldstein v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldstein v. Greenberg, 18 Misc. 61, 41 N.Y.S. 21, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Daly, P. J.

As the action was for wages earned by a female employed other than as a domestic servant, and the amount of damages recovered was less than $10, plaintiff is entitled to $5 additional costs, and the justice should have inserted that amount in the judgment. Consol. Act, chap. 410, Laws 1882, §§ 1424 and 1420. As the respondent does not dispute this, and there is no question upon which a new trial need be ordered, we shall direct that the judgment be modified by adding the $5 additional costs.

Where there is a mere error in a matter of figures and a new trial will not change thé result, a judgment may be modified even by increasing the amount of the recovery. Golde v. Whipple & Co., 7 App. Div. 48; 39 N. Y. Supp. 964.

The judgment modified accordingly, without costs to either party.

McAdam and Bischoff, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified by adding to plaintiff’s recovery $5 additional costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacDonald v. Johns
115 N.Y.S. 695 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Fischer v. Cohen
22 Misc. 117 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Powers v. Gouraud
19 Misc. 268 (New York Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Misc. 61, 41 N.Y.S. 21, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-greenberg-nyappterm-1896.