Goldstein v. Goldstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Goldstein v. Goldstein

331 A.2d 836, 232 Pa. Super. 712, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1807

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 6, 1975

DocketAppeals, Nos. 491 and 492

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 331 A.2d 836 (Goldstein v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Goldstein, 331 A.2d 836, 232 Pa. Super. 712, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1807 (Pa. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Order of the court below, at No. D-523-72 (No. 492, April Term, 1974) as to the custody of the children, is affirmed. Order of the court below, at No. D-685 of 1974 (No. 491, April T., 1974) for the support of the wife in the sum of $800.00 a month, is affirmed; petition for reargument refused February 25,1975.

The six Judges who heard this appeal being equally divided on this issue, the order of the court below, at No. D-685 of 1974 (No. 491, April T., 1974) for the support of each of the two children in the amount of $600.00 per month per child, is affirmed. HOFFMAN, Cercone, and Spaeth, JJ., would reduce the order to $400.00 per month for each child.

Van der Voort, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Order of the court below, at No. D-523-72 (No. 492, April Term, 1974) as to the custody of the children, is affirmed. Order of the court below, at No. D-685 of 1974 (No. 491, April T., 1974) for the support of the wife in the sum of $800.00 a month, is affirmed; petition for reargument refused February 25,1975.

The six Judges who heard this appeal being equally divided on this issue, the order of the court below, at No. D-685 of 1974 (No. 491, April T., 1974) for the support of each of the two children in the amount of $600.00 per month per child, is affirmed. HOFFMAN, Cercone, and Spaeth, JJ., would reduce the order to $400.00 per month for each child.

Van der Voort, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 A.2d 836, 232 Pa. Super. 712, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-goldstein-pasuperct-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack