Goldstein v. Goldstein
This text of 123 A.D.2d 739 (Goldstein v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 to modify the child support provisions of a separation agree[740]*740ment, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Kaiser, J.), dated May 15, 1985, which awarded the respondent $3,000 in counsel fees.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner husband contends that the Family Court erred in directing him to pay the respondent wife $3,000 in counsel fees. We disagree. Whether counsel fees should be awarded is a matter for the discretion of the court (see, Domestic Relations Law § 238; Resslhuber v Resslhuber, 57 AD2d 552). Viewing the totality of the circumstances, including the petitioner’s superior present income, the court properly exercised its discretion in awarding the respondent wife $3,000 in counsel fees. Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, a spouse need not establish indigency as a prerequisite to the recovery of a counsel fee (see, McCann v Guterl, 100 AD2d 577), nor does her advancement of a fee to her attorney present an impediment to reimbursement where the court later finds that her spouse should have paid the fee (see, Ross v Ross, 90 AD2d 541, 542; Silver v Silver, 63 AD2d 1017). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 A.D.2d 739, 507 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-goldstein-nyappdiv-1986.