Goldstein v. Goldstein
219 A.D. 785
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goldstein v. Goldstein. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 A.D. 470 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1927·Published
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, MeAvoy and Proskau<, J5. [786]*786Samuel Rothman v. Wm. J. Oberdorfer, Inc.— Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, MeAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldstein v. Goldstein, 219 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
219 A.D. 785 (Goldstein v. Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.