Goldstein v. Fresh Meadows Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Fresh Meadows Associates, Inc.

71 A.D.2d 911, 419 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13164

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 20, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 911 (Goldstein v. Fresh Meadows Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Fresh Meadows Associates, Inc., 71 A.D.2d 911, 419 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendants from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 9, 1979, which directed them to appear at an examination before trial and to produce certain documents. The appeal brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated February 28, 1979, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination, except that it limited the request for documents "to a time period of one year prior to and subsequent to the date of the accident in question.” Appeal from the order dated January 9, 1979 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated February 28, 1979 affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. The examination shall proceed at the place designated in the order dated January 9, 1979, at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by plaintiffs, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. We interpret the orders to mean that the books and papers to be produced are those relevant and necessary to enable the defendants to be properly deposed. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendants from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 9, 1979, which directed them to appear at an examination before trial and to produce certain documents. The appeal brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated February 28, 1979, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination, except that it limited the request for documents "to a time period of one year prior to and subsequent to the date of the accident in question.” Appeal from the order dated January 9, 1979 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated February 28, 1979 affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. The examination shall proceed at the place designated in the order dated January 9, 1979, at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by plaintiffs, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. We interpret the orders to mean that the books and papers to be produced are those relevant and necessary to enable the defendants to be properly deposed. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 911, 419 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-fresh-meadows-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1979.