Goldstein v. BGC Holdings, L.P.
This text of Goldstein v. BGC Holdings, L.P. (Goldstein v. BGC Holdings, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JENNIFER GOLDSTEIN and KEVIN § O’MALLEY, § § No. 427, 2022 Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § BGC HOLDINGS, L.P., BGC GP, LLC, § BGC FINANCIAL, L.P., and BGC § C.A. No. N21C-12-069 PARTNERS, INC., § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. §
Submitted: August 9, 2023 Decided: August 23, 2023
Before VALIHURA, LeGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
Now this 23rd day of August 2023, the Court having considered the matter on the
briefs and the record below and having concluded that the same should be affirmed on the
basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its Memorandum Opinion 1
dated October 12, 2022;
1 Upon a de novo review of Appellants’ notice argument raised under the Partnership Agreement, which the Superior Court did not address, we find such argument meritless. The notice provision in Section 13.19 of the Partnership Agreement does not apply here because there was no redemption of Appellants’ units. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the
Superior Court be and the same hereby is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goldstein v. BGC Holdings, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-bgc-holdings-lp-del-2023.