Goldstein v. Bettencourt

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Goldstein v. Bettencourt

343 N.E.2d 432, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 788, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 567

CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court

DecidedMarch 4, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 343 N.E.2d 432 (Goldstein v. Bettencourt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Bettencourt, 343 N.E.2d 432, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 788, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 567 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Assuming (as the judge apparently did) that the plaintiffs’ letter of December 31, 1969, constituted the acceptance contemplated by the option agreement, the judge was clearly correct in finding and ruling that there had been no compliance with or waiver or modification of the requirement of written notice to the optionor as to the time and place for conveyance. No substantial question of law is presented by the appeal. See Rule 1:28 of the Appeals Court, 3 Mass. [789]*789App. Ct. 807 (1975); Sabatanelli v. Travelers Ins. Co. 369 Mass. 674, 676, 678-679 (1976).

The case was submitted on briefs. Guy R. Peznola, Jr., for the plaintiffs. John M. Crean for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assuming (as the judge apparently did) that the plaintiffs’ letter of December 31, 1969, constituted the acceptance contemplated by the option agreement, the judge was clearly correct in finding and ruling that there had been no compliance with or waiver or modification of the requirement of written notice to the optionor as to the time and place for conveyance. No substantial question of law is presented by the appeal. See Rule 1:28 of the Appeals Court, 3 Mass. [789]*789App. Ct. 807 (1975); Sabatanelli v. Travelers Ins. Co. 369 Mass. 674, 676, 678-679 (1976).

The case was submitted on briefs. Guy R. Peznola, Jr., for the plaintiffs. John M. Crean for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 N.E.2d 432, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 788, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-bettencourt-massappct-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack