Goldstein v. Bennett

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Goldstein v. Bennett

174 A. 900, 117 N.J. Eq. 116, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 801

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 19, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal brings before us an order of the court of chancery denying a motion to strike a bill of complaint in the usual form seeking to have set aside a conveyance as in fraud of creditors. The appeal possesses no merit.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal brings before us an order of the court of chancery denying a motion to strike a bill of complaint in the usual form seeking to have set aside a conveyance as in fraud of creditors. The appeal possesses no merit.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Goldstein v. Bennett, 174 A. 900, 117 N.J. Eq. 116, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 801 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

174 A. 900 (Goldstein v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.