Goldstein v. Bennett

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Goldstein v. Bennett

174 A. 900, 117 N.J. Eq. 116, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 801

DecidedOctober 19, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A. 900 (Goldstein v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Bennett, 174 A. 900, 117 N.J. Eq. 116, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 801 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal brings before us an order of the court of chancery denying a motion to strike a bill of complaint in the usual form seeking to have set aside a conveyance as in fraud of creditors. The appeal possesses no merit.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal brings before us an order of the court of chancery denying a motion to strike a bill of complaint in the usual form seeking to have set aside a conveyance as in fraud of creditors. The appeal possesses no merit.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A. 900, 117 N.J. Eq. 116, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-bennett-nj-1934.