Home/New York Court of Appeals/Goldstein v. BD. OF EDUC. OF UNION FREE SCH. DIST. NO. 23, TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD

Goldstein v. BD. OF EDUC. OF UNION FREE SCH. DIST. NO. 23, TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD

224 N.E.2d 729, 18 N.Y.2d 991
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 30, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 224 N.E.2d 729 (Goldstein v. BD. OF EDUC. OF UNION FREE SCH. DIST. NO. 23, TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldstein v. BD. OF EDUC. OF UNION FREE SCH. DIST. NO. 23, TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, 224 N.E.2d 729, 18 N.Y.2d 991 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

18 N.Y.2d 991 (1966)

Howard A. Goldstein, by Sidney Goldstein, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants,
v.
Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 23, Town of Hempstead, Defendant, and Suprina's Sportland, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 22, 1966.
Decided December 30, 1966.

Alfred W. Gans and Charles F. Krause for appellants.

John M. Downing for respondent.

Concur: Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge KEATING dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial upon the ground that there were questions of fact properly submitted to the jury as to infant plaintiff's status as an invitee and his freedom from contributory negligence and as to defendant Suprina's negligence.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldstein ex rel. Goldstein v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 23
224 N.E.2d 729 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 N.E.2d 729, 18 N.Y.2d 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-bd-of-educ-of-union-free-sch-dist-no-2-ny-1966.