Goldstein, E., Pet v. Continental Casualty Co.
This text of Goldstein, E., Pet v. Continental Casualty Co. (Goldstein, E., Pet v. Continental Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
EDWIN F. GOLDSTEIN AND GRACE F. : No. 547 MAL 2014 GOLDSTEIN (H/W), : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goldstein, E., Pet v. Continental Casualty Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-e-pet-v-continental-casualty-co-pa-2015.