Goldson v. State

241 So. 3d 918
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2018
DocketNo. 1D16–5299
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 So. 3d 918 (Goldson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldson v. State, 241 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*919Appellant Segwayne Goldson appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence for sexual battery with physical force likely to cause serious injury and sexual battery. His appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief.1 Thereafter, counsel was ordered to file a supplemental brief addressing three issues identified by this court as potentially meritorious. Consideration of the arguments raised on appeal as well as our independent review of the record and applicable law has revealed no reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction and sentences are AFFIRMED .

Bilbrey, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 So. 3d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldson-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.