Goldsmith's Adm'r v. Tilly

1 H. & J. 361
General Court of Virginia·Decided October 15, 1802·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Chase, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court» Every ground of relief in equity against an award,, fs equally open in this court, upon motion, in a summary way, 3 Burr. 1258, 9.

The court will not enter at all into the merits of the matter referred to arbitrators; but only consider such legal objections as appear on the face of the award, and such as go to the misbehaviour oí arbitrators. 2 Burr. 701. Adj. Ca. 109.

A palpable mistake in law or fact, is good cause to set aside an award, if it is apparent on the face of the award. 1 Vern. 157, 3. 2 Vern. 705. 3 Atk. 644. 1 Atk. 64. 1 Ch. Rev. 76. Brownl. 63. Cro. El. 904, 1 Rol. Ab. 251.

The court will not unravel the matter and examine into the justice and reasonableness of what is awarded. 1. Stra. 301. Adj. Ca. 105.

Judgment entered on the award.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldsmith's Adm'r v. Tilly, 1 H. & J. 361 (Va. Super. Ct. 1802).

1 H. & J. 361 (Goldsmith's Adm'r v. Tilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharp v. Downey
13 A.3d 1 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2010)
Board of Education v. Prince George's County Educators' Ass'n
522 A.2d 931 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Bd. of Educ. v. PG CO. EDUCATORS'ASS'N
522 A.2d 931 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Brenner v. Plitt
34 A.2d 853 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1943)
New York Security & Trust Co. v. Davis
53 A. 669 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1902)
Witz v. Tregallas
33 A. 718 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1896)
School District No. 5 v. Sage
43 P. 341 (Washington Supreme Court, 1896)
Woods v. Matchett
47 Md. 390 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1877)
Phillips v. Shipley
1 Md. Ch. 516 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1828)