Goldsmith v. Stocker

97 A. 1079, 253 Pa. 127, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 798
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 20, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 22·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below, discharging rules for a new trial and judgment n. o, v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldsmith v. Stocker, 97 A. 1079, 253 Pa. 127, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 798 (Pa. 1916).

97 A. 1079 (Goldsmith v. Stocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blake-Cadillac Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Cackovic
54 Pa. D. & C.2d 160 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Warner Co. v. MacMullen
112 A.2d 74 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.
165 A. 16 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)